Posted by on 04 19th, 2008  - 61 views

Windows Server 2008 is better than Vista, but why?

IT infrastructure veteran Mark Wilson asks:

"It seems that, wherever you look, Windows Server 2008 is almost universally acclaimed. And rightly so - I believe that it is a fantastic operating system release (let’s face it, Windows Server 2003 and R2 were very good, too) and is packed full of features that have the potential to add significant value to solutions.

So, tell me, why are the same journalists who think Windows Server 2008 is great, still berating Windows Vista - the client version of the same operating system codebase?"

The short answer is that Server 2008 delivers new features that customers wanted, whereas Vista delivers new features that Microsoft thought its customers should want. However, it seems there may be more to it than that. Maybe Server 2008 really does perform better than Vista.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis

Related posts:

  1. Why Windows 7 might go to pieces
  2. Windows XP SP3: The Perfect Reason to Avoid Upgrading to Windows Vista
  3. Microsoft Cooking Major, Innovative Features for Windows 7 and Windows 8
  4. Great comparison: Windows Vista versus Mac OS X Leopard
  5. Windows XP SP3 hits Windows Update, Vista SP1 makes a comeback

Post a Comment


No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment